Kwing's movie Reviews on Newgrounds

[Hamlet in 60 Seconds]

xD EH LUV EHT!!

Great, man! It couldn't have been funnier! Also, QUACK!!

[Madness Formidilosus]

Cool!

Great, smooth animation, although some were hunch-backs, a common mistake for Madness tribute makers. Also, is this the one I was supposed to be in, because I could have added scene select, rewinding, and more...

[-Robot Chicken Attempt-]

OMG...

VERY, VERY well done, smooth stop-action, good voice and SFX, and great mouth animation. I helped this pass, and only now I found out that you, Dom Fera, made it.

[There She Is!! step4]

4.72... What a Score!!

Although the animation is smooth and the graphics are good, (and it may not be my place to say, as I've only watched part3 and part4), I interpret this as Romeo and Juliet with rabbits and cats (although I'm not sure). Though this is a good movie, I sense a few things that could be done. I understand a point to this movie is that you don't need to hear any dialogue to understand the plot line. While this is done well, it could be done better. For instance, adding slightly more intense actions to the movie, which is why, for instance, Waterlollies is easy to understand. Sometimes, a difficult plot line to grasp because of lack of dialogue can be good, but in this case, it's not. When a complex plot line is difficult to understand, it is usually set up so that the viewer can still perceive the video's plot line by paying close attention to the story. Even as this is a sequel, and I may not understand the plot as I haven't watched the first two parts, a good sequel ALWAYS has at least a short explanation (in words or visuals) of the plot, so, even as I was able to know and accept part of the plot, though it was perceivable, it was not fluent, and it was sketchy.
Aside from the plot, while the graphics are well done, they are simple (which IS a style, meaning it's not necessarily a bad thing) but as the plot line is poorly developed, more visually intensive graphics would have redeemed the movie a LOT more, and finally, the animation is the same. While simple, it is still choppy around the edges, and while I'm a pretty poor animator myself, if this is to sustain a score so high, it would be best to steeply increase the smoothness of the movie.
Conclusion: The entire video is basically a remake of Romeo and Juliet (which isn't a bad thing), but with a style similar to, but not as well done, as such creations as Brackenwood. The black and white style is also a "style" and is not a bad thing, but the ratio of black-and-white to color was a tad off... A good example of what it SHOULD have been is, per say, Madness, which has increasingly had more color, but has still maintained a 60-70% Black and white, where as in this video, it is about 80% black and white, where no defined style is present, making the contrast of color to the lack of it spoil each other. Good effort, and a good addition to the portal, but certainly not worthy of a score over about 4.2. Thank you for reading my comment, as it was quite long, and please don't vote Useless just because I'm rating anything less than a 10.

[Dark Green Egg]

I Didn't Even Watch It

But you should get a higher score seeing as you submitted this on your own holiday... CLOCK DAY!