00:00
00:00
Kwing
Once upon a time, water taught itself how to feel pain.

Age 29, Male

Software engineer /

United States

Joined on 7/24/07

Level:
48
Exp Points:
24,644 / 25,580
Exp Rank:
564
Vote Power:
8.85 votes
Rank:
Police Captain
Global Rank:
4,251
Blams:
365
Saves:
1,735
B/P Bonus:
16%
Whistle:
Deity
Trophies:
4
Medals:
2,229
Gear:
5

"HAU TEH WULD WURX!!1" by Kwing

Posted by Kwing - February 2nd, 2010


Copied and pasta'd from a PM I sent because I don't need to rephrase this every time someone brings up the God argument. I'll just link them here.

Since so many religions oppose, I've figured that the only way billions of people can hold different faiths is that we cumulatively are "God" or an all-controlling deity. Christians sometimes use the metaphor that Jesus and God are inside of us and are everywhere, but it's really not a metaphor. My definition of God is the sum of all matter, energy, consciousness, thought, and emotion. Since these things ARE everything, they must control everything.

But since God is spread through unliving matter and over a googol of organisms (ranging from single-celled to the most complex systems), we individually hold very little power. Because of this we are subjective to laws of physics, the will of others, and the like. Science and physics are statistical; if we were all to stop believing in gravity and stop remembering it for all the billions of years we HAVE existed in it (neigh impossible since we would have to deny forces present and visible to the eye; normally only insane people could achieve this), then gravity would cease to exist.

Because of this, forces of our faiths have created outer regions (starting as concepts and perhaps invisibly manifesting after a time) of our universe to fit our beliefs (heaven, hell, limbo, etc.) and so two contradicting theories can exist and both be true (like doublethink incarnate, if you've read 1984).

This means any additional theories I can estimate will not be permanent, rather they will only exist to be true for a time until the flow of the universe shifts by decree of an entity powerful enough to do so (which may be possible from anywhere in the polyverse), but by entity I don't mean it has to be a single being or consciousness; it can be collective consciousness, or even a bunch of individuals that have nothing more in common than shared ideals.

Well I do have "additional" theories, and the point of this composition was to display them. After having read this, people have asked me what I think happens to a person after death. I'd have to guess what happens to our intellect is similar to what happens to our bodies. Our personality, values, traits, memories, and intelligence break off into pieces the way decomposers feed upon us. These mental properties float around in the astrological plane (or the fourth dimension) until, like the nutrition in our bodies, they are used in the creation of another entity. Some parts stay intact, and some are simply lost. These 'lost' pieces still exist the way matter is indestructible, but hold the identity of a Lego model that has been completely disassembled; it's just as good as gone. If a sufficiently intact piece of the mind makes it into another sentient organism such as a human, they may experience past lives. In the way that only a part of the person remains, many people may share the past live of one person, especially if a particularly vivid or traumatic experience has bound the memories together, making them more resilient to decomposition.

Another highly debated issue in philosophy or religion is the creation of the universe. My theory on this is that this energy (both physical and spiritual) and matter swirled around (not necessarily obeying any laws of physics) until our universe was created entirely out of chance. The existence of an organism, especially something that thought of time in a linear fashion, would tether and preserve the current state of the universe, until the more intelligent creatures came into existence, cementing the rules of the universe more and more. It may seem improbable for everything to exist as it is, but if the universe were swirling around with no consciousness to perceive it, the span of time would really be nonexistent. Time that cannot be perceived is time that does not exist. So the cosmos would endlessly toil until some kind of organism or entity was created that had an inherent instinct to survive (like life on Earth). From this point, the entity would adapt to its environment and eventually shape it into something more hospitable.

I have one more paragraph I'll type later and it's on identity. Kind of unrelated but interesting nonetheless.

Now time for mindless drivel:

.
/* */


Comments

A very interesting concept. although I'm not sure how it works that if we don't believe in gravity, it won't exist. I think it still exists whether we believe in it or not. For one matter, humans, I think, are the only organisms to our knowledge that hold "faith" in believe, having the capacity for intelligence. The thing is, humans have only existed for a fraction of the universe's lifespan (well, intelligent humans anyways). Forces and matter still existed before "faith" in them existed.

But anyways, its cool to think, things only exist if you believe they exist. Like the saying, if no one is around to hear a tree fall, it doesn't make a sound.

Have you read "Sophie's World"? It sorta interestingly applies the concept to fiction.

Never read Sophie's World.

However, I think I can explain what you're wondering about this anti-gravity theory. Basically, the concept of an anti-belief of gravity (especially for billions of years to compensate for the strongly-cemented existing gravity) is as impossible as gravity ceasing to exist anyway, but supposing such fundamental intellectual barriers could be overcome, so could gravity. Have you read 1984? O'Brien talks about something similar when he explains how Big Brother is omnipotent.

wtf

INORITE?

Oh, I've gotta remind myself to throw in something about reincarnation and the energy flow, too. Always more room for "wtf", eh?

I know few who dislike final fantasy ^_^. i'm a fan of all though im missing 4 of the 13 that are out.

I don't get too hyped over new video games so I usually read reviews before getting a Final Fantasy. So far I've played FFI, FFX, FFXII, Dissidia, and FFT. I liked Tactics the best and and FFX the least.

I HATE JIMMY PAGE! GET THOSE FAGGOTS OFF THE STAGE!!!

i made a news post related to MSI. it features me in make up.
cuz i luf dressing up LOLOLOL

I LOVE MSI!!!

I already posted on it.

My favorite is a tough break between Step Up, Ghetto Blaster and Backmask.

Diabolical from the Tight album is also amazing.

Did you even read the rest of it?

Your last paragraph gives me the impression you have a few ideals of reincarnation following death. I've always thought this to be a very interesting concept, but never really considered it in a serious light. I just see no evidence or reason to believe in such, but everyone differs when it comes to death.

I, on the other hand, firmly believe the answer lies right in front of our eyes. Think for a second, what happens to you when you sleep and you have no dreams? You wake up, correct? Nothing happens. Nothing. Comas, knocked out, all the same principle and the same rule applies to death. Nothing. You cease to exist in every way.

How did you feel before you were born? What were you before you were born? What do you remember before you were born? Nothing. You didn't exist and so will you continue after you die.

Just my thoughts, don't take it like I'm bashing you, just showing a different perspective.

Good day.

Yes, I'm pretty sure reincarnation exists. What I don't like about your comment is near the end, when you ask "What do you remember before you were born? Nothing." The only part about it that bothered me was that you made that assumption.

haha noooo, reading too much english gives me head achecs

:c

Fine, no maledom for you then. >:C

lol wat is maledom?

Use Google, please.