Kwing's game Reviews on Newgrounds

[LOLympics 100m Flash]

It's good for what it's trying to be but DAMN is it frustrating (though as you say easier than QWOP.) I'm sure there's a certain shape to the mouse should be moving in but with no practice mode or any hints all I can really get is that an orbit that's higher on the left side and and lower on the right side makes me move slowly and consistently an every once in a while when experimenting I can make a huge leap forward (but not replicate it.)

The graphics and presentation are there but this feels actively difficult not just to play but even to enjoy.

AthleticDesign responds:

Thanks for the feedback. Yes, my intention was to include elaborate instructions of animated mice & corresponding running strides for basically every input parameter. But in the end, the hastily put together instructions on display had to do. If the complicated input stays, those elaborate instructions will eventually join :)

Actually, intricate shape parameters were removed from the final uploaded version. What matters is the average deviation from the straight line between two turns. A high movement during a forward swipe will lift the heel, which generally improves performance, and a low movement during a backward swipe will straighten the leg before ground contact (also generally advantageous). So an oval movement, like the one shown, works well. But easier said than done, especially after a while of spastic action.

But yeah, instructions are severely lacking.

[ZenFish]

I have mixed feelings about this. On one hand the controls (both keyboard and phone) are simple and intuitive. On the other hand the difficulty is frustrating and the lack of scoring mechanics makes the game unrewarding.

- Have bigger fish lose interest after some time.
- Make it so smaller fish don't dodge so well. You could perhaps add some variation where different fish can turn faster than others, making it easier to catch some than others. Or make it so that a fish can dodge for some amount of time but then becomes tired and easier to catch.
- Make it so the player's fish grows over time and perhaps display some kind of score counter so the player knows how well they're doing.
- Give the player a larger field of view.
- Some sound effects and music would be nice.
- Different graphics and colors for different fish would be nice. Perhaps different shapes could indicate how quickly a fish can turn or how fast it can move.

Currently it's advantageous to make slight turns and to be an opportunist, only catching fish you're already lined up with instead of making sharp turns to catch a fish that's about to get away. This is partly because sharp turns can put you in harm's way of larger fish and partly because by the time a smaller fish has made a sharp turn it's basically impossible to turn perfectly enough to lock onto them and chase them down.

This creates an interesting risk/reward opportunity if you could chase a really hard to catch fish to exhaustion; you would put yourself at risk by making sharp turns while being chased by other fish, but if you can keep the chase up long enough you could get rewarded with big points.

andai responds:

Thanks, appreciate the in-depth response.
Especially like the "tiredness" mechanic, that is brilliant!
Should the player get tired too? There should probably be UI for that, but I'm trying to avoid screen elements. (Maybe time remaining in fast/slow mode could be shown in some "organic" way?)

Re: Growing over time
Original prototype had this, but then player became enormous and game became boring. I think to achieve this effect, I'd have to keep the fish roughly the same size, but shrink the world instead? And add bigger and bigger enemies to keep it interesting (sharks.. whales.. submarines? ;) Or add some kind of physical changes / evolution to the fish instead... maybe Flow figured this out.

The chasing mechanics ideas are interesting too. I've made a few different versions with different controls. I'm using a simple physics system (acceleration, velocity, friction) right now but I think unfortunately it doesn't model neither actual fish behavior nor good game feel. I'll have to experiment with more interesting controls and more rewarding AI.

>Give the player a larger field of view.
Wasn't sure how to accommodate both desktop (landscape) and mobile (portrait). So I picked the worst of both worlds (I hoped a circle would be "artsy" lmao)
Not sure if Flash can handle switching orientation. Though I guess I could make a HTML wrapper that hacks it in. That's probably doable!

Thanks again for the feedback!

[Tiro escapes hell]

The concept for a point and click adventure is solid, but I wish you hadn't chosen to use a custom cursor as it's really nice to be able to see when the cursor turns into a hand over a clickable item. Otherwise it's a real pain searching around for things to click. It's also rather annoying to trigger several lines of dialogue (sometimes on accident,) especially when you have to click on the speech bubble to advance them. If items were highlighted when rolled over it would prevent the player from accidentally clicking on the same thing twice (for instance, the chairs and tables in the empty classroom all trigger the same dialogue even though a player might consider them to be different objects.)

What you have now is a decent start but could use some QoL improvements as well as actually having more than just a couple different rooms to explore.

Tlegendprox0x2 responds:

Thank you! I will take all these comments into consideration!

[Ruffy the Shelline - Prototype version]

It's surprising this is where you chose to stop, because most of the game (collision and physics) are already there. Even the menu has some nice polish to it and the graphics are really cute. This game could still be solid even without coding in enemies or new mechanics, a simple timer and actual level design could have made this a fun game to speedrun. I look forward to seeing the final product.

mebrouk responds:

I'm working on the full game, with my friends on Discord.
Hopefully, You're gonna like it more than the prototype version

[Blocky's Funny Doings Interactive]

The animations are okay but rely too heavily on tweens and easing. The buttons have seriously messed up hitboxes. More animations or even just a higher quality of the ones already present would be appreciated.

SuperGibaLogan responds:

the reason why the animations are a little wonky is because i wanted to finish the game as fast as possible
also the hitboxes are messed up because i used masks to make the symbols

[SMILEY clicker :)]

This was way more engaged than I thought it would be and I nearly quit before unlocking the actual game at 50 clicks. By the end it's not exactly *hard* but damn does it get tiring beating away all three enemies at once!

For a first Flash game (in 2024!) this is impressive as well as surprisingly engaging.

As far as criticism, the crude brushstroke art works in some places, but in other places it genuinely looks bad. It wouldn't take much effort for the graphics to still be simple but at least have an acceptable level of simplicity. I also think it would be nice if the gameplay had some kind of an ebb and flow so it's not just a constant barrage of attacks form the enemies. As it is, it's both physically and mentally tiring to fight an uphill battle the whole time with no breaks.

It's a shame it looks like there are no other features before 50 clicks because I'm sure a lot of the low scoring votes are coming from people that never saw the actual game.

DrDevGuy responds:

thanks! i really appreciate the criticism! although i dont really see where the crude artwork doesnt work (i might just be blind or something) i'll see if i could do anything about it (if i can also still update the game after the whole flash forward thing lol).

and also yea i think most people probably didnt get to 50 clicks which sucks cuz there obviously was a bit more to the game, i guess bait n switch (or whatever its called idk) doesnt work well with clicker games or i might've just done something wrong in general with the start of the game lol

[Windowz XP 2012 Professional]

I came into this expecting a Windows parody, and by those standards, this is pretty lacking. After reading the description, I see that this is really an archive of old animations. Some of them are good, some of them aren't so good. Most of the things that were funny in 2012 were pretty boring, but the nostalgia factor is definitely there. If Dom Fera still visits Newgrounds I'm sure he'd appreciate all the lazer references.

A couple animations are surprisingly well-done, most aren't. Overall I think this is a good format to deliver a collaboration like this.

Kolumbo responds:

thank you! to address some of your points:

i'd say most of the animations aren't good - even included a medal referencing that! that's the point, though, we were all kids at the time & we had no idea what we were doing!

have to disagree with the 2012 thing - that stuff's hilarious

[Sound Maker]

So for a gadget like this the obvious tradeoff is going to be whether you want to lean toward useability (especially if you're only expecting the user to tinker around with your gadget for a few minutes) versus diversity of features. I think you largely struck the right balance here but there are still a handful of really important features that are missing.

First of all, what even is the scale you're using here? It's not diatonic or chromatic. Several times I went to add a note only to realize the scale you implemented skipped over the one I wanted. A single 12 note chromatic scale across one octave would have made this a lot more useable in terms of making it easy to put down the notes you want. You could also label the actual notes (and maybe tint them light or dark depending on if they're white/black keys on a piano) instead of just having colors.

Second, the scrolling is annoying if you want anything of significant length. You have to add notes bit by bit, and there's no way to copy and paste repeated sections or zoom out. For anything longer than a few measures this would be a real hassle to use. I would guess zoom would be a bit harder to do but just an input box that allows you to choose how many measures to add would be a huge QoL improvement.

Last, I don't think it would be too hard to have a couple different instruments you could choose between. Synth, guitar, and piano would probably be enough for a small scale gadget like this.

Really cool idea and the export/import feature is especially cool, but with the lack of QoL features I wouldn't want to use this long enough to create something worth exporting.

mtv129 responds:

I plan to transfer all this to Action Script 3 where everything will be much better, to be honest, I wanted to add a server but it didn’t work out

[Deeply Lost]

Aesthetically speaking this game looks fantastic. The visual style is unique and goes with the music to create a consistent theme. Not much more to say on the subject other than that you did a fantastic job.

The gameplay is where I found the game to be the most lacking. I like the level design and puzzle elements, but the intersection between graphics and gameplay is really messy. You say the collision with the player is a box, but since the box is invisible, the player is left guessing as to just where they need to stand in order to avoid enemies. Combined with how much larger the graphics are than their hitbox and certain elements that obscure large sections of the screen and the player is left really struggling to navigate levels that shouldn't be hard to navigate.

There are also instances where the collision just DOESN'T work. I noticed in at least one level, holding the down and left buttons allowed me to skip through a wall, and in another instance, having spikes activate while I was standing on them broke the collision and allowed me to move through walls until I popped out from inside of them. Combined with the aforementioned issue with obstructive graphics it made the entire collision system feel like an "anything goes" kind of deal, which would be fine in a casual platformer but is infuriating when navigating tight spaces and hazards that force you to restart a level.

I can't help but wonder if you either played and tested this game with placeholder graphics and added in the art at the last second, or if you didn't have any beta testers to warn you that this would be a major pain point.

I think the best solution to this would be to make the entirety of the game tile-based. This would preserve the puzzle and timing mechanics the game currently has and allow the graphics to largely remain the same (I suspect the messy graphics are part of your artistic vision so I don't think it makes sense to change them,) but eliminate the issue of being just a few pixels off while trying to avoid hazards.

It's a really solid concept and the integration of story, aesthetics, optional objectives, and solid puzzle mechanics showcase a very high level of effort, but unfortunately all the guesswork that comes with invisible collider boxes gives this a fatal flaw in terms of quality of life.

Alejandro-X-Azul responds:

Thanks for the feedback and the complements, Yes I knew that the collisions and hit boxes were going to be a deal because as you said, most graphics are bigger than their hitbox not way bigger but just bigger, the reason for this is because graphics change a lot and are a little fuzzy and have many shapes that just don’t go well with the structure of the game, see, To make the levels I used a square tile tablet, let’s say 4x6 depending on the level, this helps to settle a structure for the level, each tile is reserved to each object in the level, this is good until I add the drawings which have many shapes which make it confusing, I understand, for example the main character is very tall but his hit box is a perfect square so I placed the hitbox above his feet to make it appear as it is all about where he is standing at so the head and shoulders don’t collide with anything, I couldn’t change the character at much to be smaller for his hitbox because it would just look bad, legs are supposed to be larger then the stomach and lastly the head, I removed his neck to make it smaller but did not help much. Now to solve this issue I created a second character which is the blue guy (you unlock him with 18 stars or someth) this one is smaller and fits better because his head is close to his feet in fact, he is an alien octopus xd. Now, something I did not mention in the description is that the chracters hitbox square has a small circle inside, this circle is the one that interacts with the enemies, the enemies have their own circle as well, this is due because a squares distance from its corners to its center is different than from its sides to the center, so if it was only square to square then standing diagonally towards the enemy will make you collide with it easier than standing close next to him. So only the square is there to collide with the levers and the ground(clouds) but the circle inside is for the enemies
As for the rest, yes there may be certain bugs in some levels where you can pass above the grounds but it would be helpful if you stated which level is it to correct it
Thanks for your time
And also thanks for appreciating the effort it takes to make games on flash, some users don’t understand how limited is flash 8 and how painful it is to make games there

[La Renault Clio V6]

The driving mechanics are functional, but the lack of collision obviously makes it impossible to have win/lose conditions or even a complete game loop. You could probably add a speed penalty for going off-course in about 10 lines of code and counting laps or completion time wouldn't take much more than that and would actually give the player an objective to shoot for.

mebrouk responds:

I just made this game to see if I can make a racing game, but the results were meh...